| Author |
Message
|
| Thunderball |
 Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 2:00 pm Post subject: Want to over turn the BATFE import parts ban? |
 |
|
Joined: 30 Apr 2005
Posts: 149
|
Proposed Amendment to S397
Purpose: To allow for the import of repair and replacement parts only
SECTION 1.: Title 18 Chapter 44 Section 925 US Code is amended by:
(a) In section (d) subparagraph 3:
(1) striking the word ‘unlawful’ and replacing it with ‘lawful’
(2) inserting ‘parts,’ between ‘frame,‘ and ‘receiver’ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| MicroBalrog |
| Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Posts: 147
Location: Israel - Gun Nut Hell
|
| But how would you get a Representative, or Senator, to add it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Richard/SIA |
| Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 9:46 pm Post subject: The big push NOW is to pass a CLEAN bill! |
|
|
Moderator
Joined: 09 Jan 2005
Posts: 324
Location: N.W. Nevada
|
The big push NOW is to pass a CLEAN bill!
This means NO amendments of ANY kind, pro or con regards our gun rights.
ANY amendment forces the bill to go to "conference committee" for resolution, giving the anti's another chance to louse it up.
We want to avoid that if at all possible.
I understand your motivation and desire, but what we really need at this moment is for S. 397 to pass as quickly as possible, utterly devoid of amendments.
Then hammer congress and NRA, GOA, JPFO, etc. to pass some gun-control relief for the little guy in the form of H.R. 2088, H.R. 1703, H.R. 1603, and other pro-RKBA bills listed on this site under "pending legislation". (' ') |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Thunderball |
| Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2005 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joined: 30 Apr 2005
Posts: 149
|
There is absolutely no chance that the antis could do anything to the bill in conference committee but I understand what you are saying.
I also would like a bill with no amendments.
This was in case the antis tried some sneaky stuff. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
